<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Read</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericjamesstone.com/blog/2008/07/02/the-big-read/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericjamesstone.com/blog/2008/07/02/the-big-read/</link>
	<description>Science Fiction and Fantasy Author</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:13:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen</title>
		<link>http://www.ericjamesstone.com/blog/2008/07/02/the-big-read/comment-page-1/#comment-20725</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericjamesstone.com/blog/2008/07/02/the-big-read/#comment-20725</guid>
		<description>This list is from a survey taken in connection with World Book Day. The books are listed here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/mar/01/news

You can read more about World Book Day here:
http://www.worldbookday.com/

The NEA\&#039;s Big Read only has 24 books on its list.
http://www.neabigread.org

I think the claim about the average person only reading six books was taken from the NEA\&#039;s Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. That\&#039;s probably how the NEA\&#039;s Big Read got connected to the World Book Day\&#039;s survey and list. 

\&quot;The 2002 SPPA asked all respondents how many books they read in 2002. Respondents who answered affirmatively indicated that they read approximately six books.\&quot;

The 2002 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts (SPPA) was conducted as a supplement to the U.S. Census Bureauâ€™s Current Population Study (CPS), which scientifically selects households to represent the socio-economic characteristics of the U.S. population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list is from a survey taken in connection with World Book Day. The books are listed here:<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/mar/01/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/mar/01/news</a></p>
<p>You can read more about World Book Day here:<br />
<a href="http://www.worldbookday.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldbookday.com/</a></p>
<p>The NEA\&#8217;s Big Read only has 24 books on its list.<br />
<a href="http://www.neabigread.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.neabigread.org</a></p>
<p>I think the claim about the average person only reading six books was taken from the NEA\&#8217;s Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. That\&#8217;s probably how the NEA\&#8217;s Big Read got connected to the World Book Day\&#8217;s survey and list. </p>
<p>\&#8221;The 2002 SPPA asked all respondents how many books they read in 2002. Respondents who answered affirmatively indicated that they read approximately six books.\&#8221;</p>
<p>The 2002 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts (SPPA) was conducted as a supplement to the U.S. Census Bureauâ€™s Current Population Study (CPS), which scientifically selects households to represent the socio-economic characteristics of the U.S. population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Big Read &#124; DrCris Reads</title>
		<link>http://www.ericjamesstone.com/blog/2008/07/02/the-big-read/comment-page-1/#comment-20714</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big Read &#124; DrCris Reads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericjamesstone.com/blog/2008/07/02/the-big-read/#comment-20714</guid>
		<description>[...] a Living and thought I would participate. Purplesque has also posted the list. Apparently, it is a bit of a scam, but I can look beyond [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a Living and thought I would participate. Purplesque has also posted the list. Apparently, it is a bit of a scam, but I can look beyond [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

